Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 |
101. Sticky:CSM Chairman Hotline - AMA (Ask Me Anything) non-NDA about EVE, the CSM & CCP - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Seleene wrote: Poked Arrow this morning and got a thread on the Inventory stuff posted: LINKAGE Thanks.
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.18 20:11:00
|
102. Sticky:CSM Chairman Hotline - AMA (Ask Me Anything) non-NDA about EVE, the CSM & CCP - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Seleene wrote: Rengerel en Distel wrote: Any more iterations on: Unified Inventory - Window states still don't save. They also don't save different states between station/space. Yep. The UI is under constant revision. Rengerel en Dist...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.17 15:18:00
|
103. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Snow Axe wrote: Voting systems? Seriously? Nothing like trying to come up with a solution when you can't even clearly identify what the problem is. I'm pretty sure they clearly defined the problem as there being too few voters. That problem...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.15 12:52:00
|
104. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Rengerel en Distel wrote: 1) People should be able to vote for a council, not one member. There should be fewer spots on the council, and fewer candidates. I'd make the council 7 spots, 12 candidates, and after #7, they're alternates. If someon...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.12 23:49:00
|
105. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: Wouldn't it be far less arbitrary to just have CCP give the players more notice on what is going into the year's worth of work and encourage the candidates to actually document the fact that they are capable of speak...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.12 02:44:00
|
106. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Yeep wrote: Dersen Lowery wrote: As long as the categories are non-exclusive and non-binding, I don't really see the problem. If a candidate had to make a statement on each one, that would make sense. If the candidate believes that CCP is f...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.11 22:48:00
|
107. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I can see the point of why some believe a platform is useless, because it's CCP that sets the agenda. The players though need to know where the candidates stand on issues to know if they're able to roll with that, and make informed decisions. If C...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.11 19:14:00
|
108. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote: Scatim Helicon wrote: Highsec and 0.0 are almost like 2 different games that share a server in many ways, and yes - in highsec most of the organising is done for the residents by NPCs, CONCORD, etc, so there simply ...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.11 19:01:00
|
109. Sticky:The voting reform discussion - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
1) People should be able to vote for a council, not one member. There should be fewer spots on the council, and fewer candidates. I'd make the council 7 spots, 12 candidates, and after #7, they're alternates. If someone has to resign, dies, goes i...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.11 15:21:00
|
110. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Sizeof Void wrote: If I were a ruling member of the CFC, I'd actually be pushing to get a carebear representative on the CSM, rather than 3 CFC members. I'd want the carebear issues to be heard and properly addressed by ...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.11 00:23:00
|
111. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
You can be anti-goon and be against idiotic proposals. They're not mutually exclusive.
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.10 21:12:00
|
112. Changing CSM Votes: Standpoints of the CSM - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Hans Jagerblitzen wrote: Cede Forster wrote: that is why i am looking, some clear statements from CSM and candidats - some clear words would be most appriciated. Do they support the suggested system? A different system? The current system? I...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.10 15:35:00
|
113. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Alavaria Fera wrote: Sal Volatile wrote: You haven't answered a single damn question in the whole thread. Look at this chairman, ladies and gentlemen, just look at him! Ask an easier question like "why is CCP so great and why should we c...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.10 02:03:00
|
114. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I don't think all the trolling in the thread by the CSM is helping their case.
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.10 01:29:00
|
115. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Lord Zim wrote: Rengerel en Distel wrote: I think it's pretty clear the proposed system is a non-starter. The CSM should just admit that and close this thread down and start over. If you really want ideas on a new system, ask us for ideas, d...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.10 00:57:00
|
116. Herr Ronin For CSM 8: High Sec Representative - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
Xolve wrote: Just out of curiosity, what exactly in High Sec demands its own representation? Literally every aspect of High Sec mechanics, except say CONCORD and Low Security Status applies elsewhere in the game, and would be theoretically co...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.10 00:46:00
|
117. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I think it's pretty clear the proposed system is a non-starter. The CSM should just admit that and close this thread down and start over. If you really want ideas on a new system, ask us for ideas, don't start it with a proposal stating you want t...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.10 00:23:00
|
118. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
As I said like 10 pages ago, the simplest solution is still to just list the 12 candidates and let people pick 7. If a large bloc wants to improve their odds, they get more candidates in the 12. The large bloc would most likely get all their candi...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.09 00:32:00
|
119. Call For Discussion : CSM Voting Reform - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
I'd rather they list all canditates, and you pick the 7 or whatever candidates you would put on the council. It's a council, you shouldn't be limited to just 1 or 2. Different candidates have different attributes, and you shouldn't have to decide ...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.08 14:44:00
|
120. Sticky:CSM Chairman Hotline - AMA (Ask Me Anything) non-NDA about EVE, the CSM & CCP - in Jita Park Speakers Corner [original thread]
The CSM can't promise to get anything changed, they can only promise to ask CCP to get it changed. I really have no desire to go back to their election posts and/or blogs to see if they promised to get spod fixed. If they did, then go ahead and ke...
- by Rengerel en Distel - at 2012.09.04 14:25:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |